Efectos de la reestructuración neoliberal: comparación de las estrategias sindicales en Argentina, Brasil, México, Canadá y Estados Unidos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este articulo se hace un estudio comparativo de los resultados del proceso de globalizacion en cinco paises del continente, el cual permite comprender que la clave, no solamente para la sobrevivencia del movimiento sindical sino incluso para su fortalecimiento en una coyuntura desfavorable, es la estrategia que es capaz de desplegar frente a la estructura de oportunidades economicas y politicas, los marcos regulatorios o institucionales establecidos y el tipo de fuente de poder sobre los que se asienta su accion. Las estrategias de los movimientos sindicales de Brasil y Canada y de Estados Unidos despues de 1995, les permitieron ganar un importante lugar en el escenario politico laboral a traves del desarrollo de nuevas fuentes de poder y de recursos dentro del sistema politico, y dentro de la negociacion colectiva, ofreciendo importantes argumentos contra la idea de que el movimiento sindical esta condenado a su desaparicion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".