MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Incidence and Outcomes of Catheter Related Thrombosis in Acute Leukemia: Single Centre Experience

2016· article· en· W2988655118 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kay Htun, Mabel Ma, Agnes Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)ThrombosisSurgeryAcute leukemiaComplicationCatheterVenous thrombosisCentral venous catheterLeukemiaPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Catheter related thrombosis (CRT) is a common complication of central venous catheters (CVCs) in patients with hematological and solid organ cancers. However, little is known about the incidence of CRT in acute leukemia patients and the optimal approach to anticoagulant therapy especially in the presence of concurrent and often prolonged thrombocytopenia. Some of these patients might receive sub-therapeutic anticoagulation with a potentially higher risk of recurrent CRT, device failure and thromboembolic events. Method We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH), Canada from January 2014 to December 2014. The study aimed to determine the incidence of CRT and review the current practice of CRT management. The outcomes were symptomatic thrombotic and bleeding events, catheter complications (e.g. infection), and blood product use. Only objectively confirmed CRT cases were included. The follow up period was from CRT diagnosis to last known date of follow-up. Results A total of 151 patients were identified, of whom 116 received CVC insertion. Eleven patients (78.5%) received more than one CVC (median 2, range 1-4). Fourteen patients (12%) were diagnosed with symptomatic CRT (table). All CRT events occurred within 30 days (range 4-30 days) after CVC insertion and 85.7% within the first 6 months (range 0.26-6 months) after their diagnosis of acute leukemia. Median follow up of these 14 patients was 447 patient-days (range 13-759). Two patients were lost to follow-up at 13 and 23 days due to transfer of care to other hospitals. Three out of 14 patients died during follow up (at 72, 86 and 372 days, respectively) due to leukemia. Eleven patients (78.5%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Three untreated patients had CRT confined to basilic vein. Nine out of 11 patients required LMWH dose reduction due to thrombocytopenia according to our local protocol (1). Full dose weight-based LMWH was administered if platelet count could be maintained above 50 × 109/L (with or without platelet transfusion in acute phase, i.e. within 1 month of CRT diagnosis). For platelet counts between 20 and 50 × 109/L, half-dose LMWH was administered with close monitoring. LMWH was withheld if platelet count was lower than 20 x 109/L in subacute phase, i.e. after 1 month. No patient had recurrent CRT or pulmonary embolism during anticoagulation and follow up. Bleeding events occurred in 3 (27%) patients during anticoagulation. There was one major bleeding (spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma), one clinically relevant non-major bleeding (adenovirus induced cystitis and hematuria requiring hospital admission) and one minor bleeding (bruise) event. Catheter-related infection was documented in 4 (36%) patients. No deaths occurred due to CRT or its treatment. Patients were treated for a minimum of 3 months or longer if the implicated catheter was still in situ. Median treatment time was 3 months (range 2 weeks-7 months). Three patients stopped anticoagulation prior to 3 months (palliation and lost follow-up). None of the CVC was removed as a result of CRT, but 4 were removed for infection, 3 for the completion of chemotherapy, 2 non tunnelled catheters were replaced with long term CVCs, 1 was accidentally dislodged and 1 was removed for logistic reason. The median CVC dwell time was 30 days (range 4-173). Among the 11 treated patients, 8 patients received platelet transfusions during treatment with LMWH. Eighty seven doses of pooled platelets (or its equivalent) and 64 packed red cells were transfused. Sixteen doses (18%) of platelet transfusions were given to keep platelet count above 20-50 for anticoagulation during the first month of CRT; the remainder were given for clinical indications. Only 4 units (6%) of packed red cells were transfused for major bleeding in one patient while 60 units were used for routine support when hemoglobin was <80 g/L. Conclusion Twelve percent of newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients developed CRT. Anticoagulation with LMWH using a dose reduction approach for thrombocytopenia appeared safe and effective with no recurrent VTE events and few bleeding events. 1) Lee AY, Peterson EA. Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2013 Oct 3; 122:2310-7 Table Table. Disclosures Lee: LEO: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→