Imaginaires géographiques de la francophonie minoritaire canadienne chez des immigrants et des réfugiés d’expression française1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le rôle des représentations sociales et spatiales dans les processus d’inclusion et d’exclusion constitue un terrain d’étude privilégié pour comprendre les relations de pouvoir entre groupes dominants et dominés. Le but de cet article est de poser un regard nouveau sur cette question en adoptant le concept d’imaginaires géographiques pour examiner les représentations que des immigrants et des réfugiés d’expression française se font des communautés francophones en situation minoritaire (CFSM) au Canada. Pour ce faire, nous présentons les résultats d’une étude de cas instrumentale sur les expériences d’immigrants francophones dans deux villes comportant des CFSM en Ontario : London et Ottawa. Notre analyse met en lumière les dynamiques sociospatiales de la francophonie minoritaire canadienne telles qu’elles sont perçues par les immigrants francophones et leur rôle dans la négociation de leur appartenance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".