Efficient Distributed Processing for Large Scale MIMO Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In large scale multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), high spectral and energy efficiencies comes at the expense of a high computational complexity baseband processing. Many contributions have been proposed to reduce such complexity using matrix inversion approximation techniques for instance. On the other hand, to reduce the constraint on the interconnects' bandwidth, fewer decentralized processing techniques have emerged. Here, we propose a computationally efficient technique based on embedding one single Gauss-Seidel iteration within every ADMM based detection iteration. The simulations are performed using an LTE-like TDD-OFDM frame structure and waveform, under perfect and non-perfect channel state information (CSI). Early results reveal that the proposed ADMM-GS algorithm can outperform the centralised GS based technique processing in a high SNR region and high load regime. In addition ADMM-GS' performance exhibits relatively less sensitivity to channel estimation error; a characteristic inherited from the centralised GS technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".