Deepframe: A Profile-Driven Compiler for Spatial Hardware Accelerators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tracing code paths to form extended basic blocks is useful in many areas, compiler optimizations [1], improving instruction cache behavior [2] and custom-hardware offloading [3]. Prior work has been plagued by small traces, limited either by the overheads of dynamic profiling, statically available information [4], or side-exit branches [5]. In this work, we rethink what code path sequences to fuse and construct long traces for offloading to spatial accelerators, while minimizing the occurrence of side exits which limit dynamic coverage. We introduce a novel technique that recasts learning a program's execution patterns as a natural-language-processing problem, CBOW (Continuous Bag of Words). We then use a deep learning network to learn the relationships among paths. During the compilation phase, the compiler uses a sequence miner to decide what paths are likely to occur. The learning network predicts a Deepframe online, which is an extended basic block comprising a multi-path sequence (each path itself is composed of multiple basic blocks). We demonstrate the efficacy of Deepframe on spatial hardware accelerators and find the following: i) Deepframe can construct up to 5x (max: 27x) longer offload regions compared to prior approaches. ii) Surprisingly far-flung ILP (instruction-level parallelism) and MLP (memory-level parallelism) can be mined from the frames statically (5.5x increase in ILP and 10.5x increase in MLP). iii) The frames offloaded to the spatial accelerator have minimal side exits (mis-speculation) and achieve sufficient dynamic coverage to improve overall application performance (up to 9x improvement). We will be releasing open-source our end-to-end compiler prototype based on LLVM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".