Las prácticas de responsabilidad social empresarial en las pequeñas y medianas empresas en Jalisco y Quebec: ¿Isomorfismo despues del TLCAN?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo es cotejar la presencia de un efecto de convergencia e isomorfismo en prácticas de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial (RSE), desde lo predicho por la teoría neoinstitucionalista en PYMEs de Jalisco, México y de Quebec, Canadá. Ambos sometidos a las mismas reglas institucionales surgidas del TLCAN. El método se basó sobre el análisis de 200 PYME localizadas en Quebec y 200 en Jalisco. Se hicieron pruebas ANOVA, sobre un instrumento de desarrollo propio, para corroborar si hay similitudes isomorfas o no de cada variable analizada. Los resultados tienden a demostrar que las PYME de Jalisco son similares a las de Quebec sobre prácticas de RSE. Por lo que se concluye, como primeros hallazgos, que las hipótesis planteadas constituyen unas simplificaciones restrictivas de la realidad para comprender el fenómeno de la influencia de los tratados entre ambos países sobre las prácticas de RSE en las PYME de cada país.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".