MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989413112 · doi:10.2475/08.2019.03

Provenance of the Newfoundland Appalachian foreland basins

2019· article· en· W2989413112 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shawna E. White, John W.F. Waldron, Greg Dunning, S. Andrew DuFrane

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeland basinGeologyOrdovicianZirconAllochthonDevonianProvenancePaleontologyLaurentiaPaleozoicGeochronologyTectonicsNappe

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tectonic history of the Appalachian orogen is recorded in the adjacent foreland. Offshore seismic data suggest that an initial, Middle Ordovician foreland basin was filled by sources in Newfoundland, whereas the Late Ordovician foreland basin was loaded and filled by sources to the SW, in the Québec segment of the orogen, where NW-vergent Taconian arc-continent collision may have continued later than in Newfoundland. We test this hypothesis using U/Pb ages of detrital zircon within foreland basin successions in western Newfoundland. Previously published results from the oldest foreland succession, the Middle Ordovician Goose Tickle Group, demonstrate ages similar to units preserved with the Humber Arm Allochthon, emplaced during Middle Ordovician Taconic orogenesis, including a predominant Paleoproterozoic peak at 1.85 Ga. In this study we investigated U/Pb geochronology of detrital zircon from younger foreland successions from Upper Ordovician to Devonian. The largest proportion of analyses within all foreland successions fall between 0.95 and 1.3 Ga, with largest peaks occurring between 1.0 and 1.1 Ga, typical of zircon derived from the Grenville Orogen. Earlier Mesoproterozoic and Paleoproterozoic ages range from 1.3 to 2.0. The abundance of Mesoproterozoic grains and conspicuous lack of 1.85 Ga Paleoproterozoic zircon in the overlying Upper Ordovician Long Point Group and latest Silurian to Early Devonian Clam Bank Formation indicates that these sediments were not derived from units within the Humber Arm Allochthon. Probability density plots of continental margin units in the Québec/New England segment of the orogen demonstrate a similar strong Mesoproterozoic and weak Paleoproterozoic signature, suggesting derivation of the Long Point Group from the Québec segment of the orogen. Within the mid-Paleozoic Clam Bank - Red Island Road succession, typical Gondwanan ages are absent and 1.0 Ga grains derived from the Grenville Orogen are abundant. This is consistent with underthrusting of the Gondwanan microcontinents Ganderia and Avalonia during Salinic and Acadian orogenesis. Only Mesoproterozoic zircon grains were found in the Early Devonian Red Island Road Formation, consistent with derivation from Mesoproterozoic Grenville massifs in western Newfoundland or Cape Breton Island which were exhumed during Devonian Acadian inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of ScienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207