Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paul Robert Magocsi. The Roots of Ukrainian Nationalism: Galicia as Ukraine's Piedmont. Toronto-London-Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 2002. xi, 214 pp.The author of this book is a noted historian who has written extensively on nationalism and related developments in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries among Rusyn-Ukrainians of Galicia and Transcarpathia, and has also made significant contributions in bibliography and cartography. He is the author of Galicia: A Historical Survey and Bibliographic Guide, Ukraine: A Historical Atlas, and the textbook A History of Ukraine. With regards to his writings on Galician Ukrainians, he is best known for his essays on cultural questions and organizational aspects of national development focusing on Old Ruthenianism, Russophilism and the Kachkovs'kyi Society-subjects which had not received much attention in Western scholarship prior to his work. Old Ruthenianism and Russophilism were failed or abandoned national currents or orientations in Galicia, and the Kachkovs'kyi Society was a cultural organization of the Old Ruthenians and later Russophiles.The title of a book can sometimes mislead a reader as to its contents. This is certainly the case with Paul Robert Magocsi's latest volume. While one might have expected an interpretive work focusing on the origins and evolution of mainstream Ukrainian nationalism and the crucial role of Galicia in its formation and evolution, this is not the case with The Roots of Ukrainian Nationalism. The book fails to provide the reader with clear answers to the crucial question of why Galician Ukraine and Galician Ukrainians played such a critical role in the Ukrainian national movement in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. One gains little insight into why today's Galician Ukrainians, as a whole, while appearing to be the most nationalistic and conservative, also seem to be the most open and politically engaged citizens in post-communist Ukraine.As noted in the preface, the book contains ten essays by the author, eight of which were published previously (although seven rather than eight of the essays indicate clearly that they have appeared in print elsewhere). The first essay is an historical survey; the second provides a theoretical framework for analyzing the Ukrainian national movement (in both Russian-and Habsburg-ruled Ukraine) in the nineteenth century; essays three to five examine Galician Ukrainian reactions to Habsburg and Soviet rule (the crucial Polish interwar period is not examined in this book); chapters six through eight deal with cultural and organizational questions largely outside of or on the margins of mainstream Ukrainian national developments in Galicia; and the final two chapters deal with national bibliography and research. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".