MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989593400 · doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0640-4

Meeting the looming policy challenge of sea-level change and human migration

2019· article· en· W2989593400 on OpenAlexfundno aff
David Wrathall, Valerie Mueller, Peter U. Clark, Andrew Reid Bell, Michael Oppenheimer, Mathew Hauer, Scott Kulp, Elisabeth Gilmore, Helen Adams, Robert E. Kopp, Kwaku K. Bruce Abel, Maia Call, Joyce Chen, A. deSherbinin, Elizabeth Fussell, Carling C. Hay, Benjamin A. Jones, Nicholas R. Magliocca, Elizabeth Mariño, Aimée B. A. Slangen, Koko Warner

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Climate Change · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKoninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek der ZeeUniversiteit UtrechtUlster UniversityYork UniversityNational Socio-Environmental Synthesis CenterOhio State UniversityOregon State UniversityPrinceton UniversityArizona State UniversityFlorida State UniversityKing's College LondonBoston CollegeSchool of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State UniversityBrown UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLoomingClimate changeGreenhouse gasNatural resource economicsKey (lock)Environmental resource managementSea level riseEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceOceanographyEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0130.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Climate ChangeSame topicClimate Change, Adaptation, MigrationFrench-language works237,207