MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989631601 · doi:10.1039/c9np00052f

Selective targeting of the DEAD-box RNA helicase eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4A by natural products

2019· review· en· W2989631601 on OpenAlexafffund
Leo Shen, Jerry Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Product Reports · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHelicaseRNA Helicase ADEAD boxRNABiologyComputational biologyVirologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covering: up to 2019Pharmacological targeting of eukaryotic mRNA translation initiation is a promising approach for cancer therapy, since several signaling pathways that are commonly deregulated during tumor progression converge on this process. The DEAD-box helicase, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4A, is essential for translation initiation and facilitates the loading of the 43S pre-initiation complex onto mRNAs. Hippuristanol, rocaglates, and pateamine A are natural products that each target eIF4A by interfering with the helicase's RNA-binding activity in distinct manners. They exert a selective change in gene expression that results in potent anti-tumorigenic activity in pre-clinical studies. This review will provide an update on the molecular mechanisms of action of these natural products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatural Product ReportsSame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207