MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989637501 · doi:10.14740/cr962

Pre-Operative Sildenafil for Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019· review· en· W2989637501 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D L Villanueva, Ruth Divine Agustin, Elmer Jasper B. Llanes

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSildenafilPulmonary hypertensionCardiologyInternal medicinePulmonary arteryPerioperativeHemodynamicsVascular resistanceSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension is a usual complication of long-standing mitral valve disease. Perioperative pulmonary hypertension is a risk factor for right ventricular failure and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve surgery. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors particularly sildenafil citrate have proven clinical benefit for pulmonary arterial hypertension but have shown discordant results in group 2 pulmonary hypertension patients. We sought to determine the effect of pre-operative sildenafil on the intra-operative hemodynamic parameters of these patients. METHODS: Studies were included if they satisfied the following criteria: 1) Randomized controlled trials; 2) Adult patients with pulmonary hypertension scheduled for elective mitral valve surgery; and 3) Reported data on changes in pre-, intra-, and post-operative hemodynamic parameters. Using PUBMED, Clinical Key, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases, a search for eligible studies was conducted from September 1 to December 31, 2018. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The primary outcome of interest is on the effect of pre-operative sildenafil on the improvement of intra-operative hemodynamic parameters such as systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances. We also investigated its effect on the post-operative mortality, length of cardiopulmonary bypass time, ventilation time, and inotrope support requirement. Review Manager 5.3 was utilized to perform analysis of random effects for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: We identified three studies involving 153 patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve surgery, showing that among those who received pre-operative sildenafil there is a significant decrease in intra-operative systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (mean difference -11.19 (95% confidence interval (CI), -20.23 to -2.15), P < 0.05) and post-operative sPAP (mean difference -13.67 (95% CI, - 19.56 to - 7.78), P < 0.05) without significantly affecting the mean arterial pressure (mean difference 1.94 (95% CI, -5.49 to 9.37), P < 0.05). The systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were not affected as well. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of pre-operative sildenafil to patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve surgery decreases intra-operative and post-operative systolic pulmonary arterial pressure without significantly affecting other systemic hemodynamic parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.009
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207