MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989639190 · doi:10.21037/amj.2019.11.01

Extrarenal adult Wilms’ tumor case report

2019· article· en· W2989639190 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Beech, Hunter R. Carlock, Jan K. Rudzinski, Daniel R Martinez, Jasreman Dhillon, Philippe E. Spiess

Bibliographic record

VenueAME Medical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWilms' tumorMedicineMalignancyPresentation (obstetrics)DiseaseKidney diseaseAdult maleCase presentationPediatricsPathologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Wilms’ tumor is the most common primary renal malignancy in children. Adult presentations of Wilms’ tumor are very rare, and extrarenal adult Wilms’ tumors even more so, with only a few reported cases in the literature. Adult patients have traditionally had a worse prognosis than children, due to presentation with advanced stages of disease, diagnostic uncertainty, and limited treatment experience. When treated with multimodal therapy in accordance with the established protocols for pediatric Wilms’ tumor, adult patients are able to achieve good outcomes. We report the case of an adult female with an extrarenal Wilms’ tumor, and review the literature surrounding this uncommon disease entity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAME Medical JournalSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207