MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989643311 · doi:10.1109/mnet.001.1900333

SDATP: An SDN-Based Adaptive Transmission Protocol for Time-Critical Services

2019· article· en· W2989643311 on OpenAlexaff
Jiayin Chen, Qiang Ye, Wei Quan, Si Yan, Phu Thinh, Weihua Zhuang, Xuemin Shen, Xu Li, Jaya Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Network · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkRetransmissionDistributed computingQuality of serviceNetwork packetNetwork congestionLatency (audio)Packet loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a comprehensive approach is proposed for 5G communication networks. In SDATP, a slice-level customized protocol is developed for supporting time-critical services that require high reliability and low-latency, such as MTC services for industrial automation. To satisfy service quality requirements for an MTC service, we introduce in-network intelligence in the proposed protocol, by enabling the functionalities of in-path caching, in-path retransmission, in-network congestion detection and congestion control. To minimize the E2E delay, we optimize the configuration of caching functionalities, including the number of enabled caching nodes, caching node placement, and probabilistic packet caching policy. Since the optimization problem is NP-hard, we simplify the problem by reducing the number of decision variables and propose a low-complexity algorithm to solve the simplified problem. Extensive simulation results are presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in terms of retransmission hops and its adaptiveness to network dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE NetworkSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207