MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989648572 · doi:10.1002/mma.6033

Least squares <i>X</i>=±<i>X</i><sup><i>η</i>*</sup> solutions to split quaternion matrix equation <i>A</i><i>X</i><i>A</i><sup><i>η</i>*</sup>=<i>B</i>

2019· article· en· W2989648572 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsQuaternionMatrix (chemical analysis)TransposeOperator (biology)CombinatoricsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsMathematical physicsAlgebra over a fieldEigenvalues and eigenvectorsGeometryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the paper, the split quaternion matrix equation A X A η * = B is considered, where the operator A η * is the η ‐conjugate transpose of A , where η ∈{ i , j , k }. We propose some new real representations, which well exploited the special structures of the original matrices. By using this method, we obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions for A X A η * = B to have X =± X η * solutions and derive the general expressions of solutions when it is consistent. In addition, we also derive the general expressions of the least squares X =± X η * solutions to it in case that this matrix equation is not consistent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it