Developing Education for Sustainable Development-Oriented-Character Learning Model for Indonesian Golden Generation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed at developing and investigating the appropriateness of education-oriented-character learning model to develop sustainability to build 2045 Indonesian golden generation. The development model was adapted from Dick and Carey Model with product trial subject to XI graders of some schools in West Nusa Tenggara. The model of character learning was implemented into Biology, Chemistry, and Physics Subjects through learning instrument which had been developed with the syntaxes of character learning model. The indicator of character assessment was adapted from character education indicators which had been combined with 21st Century Skill. The data collection instruments included self assessment and observation sheets. The findings showed that: (1) the developed character learning model had syntaxes of collect, discuss, analyze, communicate, and apply; the problem and the solution was focused on themes of environment, society, and economy; (2) education for sustainable development-oriented-character learning model which had been developed was worth applying with very good category.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it