MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989659513 · doi:10.5430/jbar.v8n2p30

Innovation-Driven Business Case of Hanuman Vitamin

2019· article· en· W2989659513 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
H.M. Jha Bidyarthi, Satya Mohan Mishra, Mayur A. Dande, Pavan M. Kuchar, A. K. Shrivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business Administration Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessAgricultural scienceBankruptcyAgricultural economicsFinanceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proverbial saying – “to have mango at the coronel’s price” - fits exactly true in case of Hanuman Vitamin Foods Ltd., Khamgaon, a Public company established in the year 1966 which produced oil cake from the stone of the mango. This uniquely innovated venture went on to add production of Sal Seed oil, Kokum oil, Dhupa Seed oil, Illepe Nuts (from Indonesia) oil and Shea Nuts (from West African countries) oil through ultra modern plants/process manufacturing De Oiled Cake (DOC) and Cocoa Butter Equivalence (CBE) and exported them to Japan, Italy, Switzerland and all European countries except US. The company became number one Indian manufacturer and exporter of these products and grew in scale and expanded by setting up a new plant at Raipur in the State of Chattisgarh. However, in 2002 – 2003, Hanuman Vitamin Foods Ltd. had to apply to the then Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) – now National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) - for being declared as sick unit and for obtaining government assistance under insolvency and bankruptcy code for its revival. And it finally stopped production in the year 2008 after which the financer banks took the possession of the company through Asset Management Company. The steep rise and fall of Hanuman Vitamin unfolds a host of significant management lessons in innovation and entrepreneurship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Business Administration ResearchSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207