MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989682036 · doi:10.1289/isee.2011.01686

SKINJEM: A JOB EXPOSURE MATRIX FOR OCCUPATIONAL SKIN CANCER RISK

2011· article· en· W2989682036 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cheryl Peters, Paul A. Demers

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreCancer Care OntarioUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob-exposure matrixOccupational exposureEnvironmental healthOccupational cancerPopulationToxicologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Estimating occupational exposure to skin carcinogens at a population level is challenging due to a lack of specific tools to do so. The objective of this project is to create a job exposure matrix for skin carcinogens (SkinJEM), flagging industries and jobs with high potential for exposure in Canada. Methods: SkinJEM is a 2-dimensional matrix created with a standard coding system (n=520) on one axis and exposure categories on the other. Exposures were selected from the CAREX Canada database and IARC monographs. Jobs were flagged as exposed if ≥25% of workers were likely to be exposed. SkinJEM also includes a flag for ‘expert re-evaluation’, where exposures in a job differ by industry, or where there is textual information available. For situations where exposure is more industry-based than occupationally (i.e. arsenic exposure in wood preservation plants), data lines have been added to reflect this. There is also an indicator of confidence for each job line. Results: Eight compounds (solar, artificial, and ionizing radiation; PAHs, creosotes, mineral oil, coal-tars; arsenic) in 3 categories (radiation, petroleum-related, metals) were identified. All 520 unique 4-digit job codes were included in the matrix, in addition to all roll-ups to less specific codes (to accommodate varying data quality in epidemiologic studies). Of note, many jobs had expected exposure to several skin carcinogens, including welders in construction, roofers, medical staff in hospitals, and workers in utilities. Conclusions: Many Canadian workers are potentially exposed to agents that are known to or suspected of causing skin cancer. Through SkinJEM, we have found that these carcinogens may be encountered together in some workplaces. Further research is required to assess the skin toxicity of chemical/radiation mixtures. Next steps will include linkages of SkinJEM to cancer registries to examine risk for melanoma from occupational exposure to skin carcinogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentFrench-language works237,207