A Comparison of Perceived Social Anxiety among Individual and Team Sports Participant High School Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aimed to investigate individual or team sports participant high school students’ perceived social anxietylevels according to their sports branch, the weekly duration/day of doing sports, the aim for doing sports and gender.Two hundred high school students (Mage=16.29 ± 1.11) participated in the study. The study designed as across-sectional study and the Turkish version of Social Anxiety for Adolescents (SAS-A) used as the data gatheringtool. In the evaluation of data independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA statistical methods used as thehypothesis tests. According to the study findings, there was not any significant difference in the variable socialanxiety according to the sports branch and the weekly duration/day of doing sports. However, significant differenceswere found between individual sports participants’ social anxiety according to aim for doing sports and gender. As aresult, this paper showed that professional individual sports participants had higher perceived social avoidance anddistress for general and new situations. Also, male individual sports participants reported a higher fear of negativeevaluation than females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".