MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989710653

Dependent Fiefs in Canada from 1632 to 1760

2003· article· fr· W2989710653 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laurent Marien

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire & Sociétés Rurales · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeudalismProperty (philosophy)Land tenureColonialismProperty rightsRural societyAgricultureSociologyEconomic systemPolitical economyPolitical scienceEconomicsGeographyLawRural areaPoliticsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of a specific type of feudal property known as the dependent fief (arrière-fief) shows that the development of the Laurentian rural landscape and of Canadian colonial society in general was far less straightforward and uniform than has been thought. A form of property originating in the Paris custom, the dependent fief was governed above all by the choices and aspirations of resident populations. It was first and foremost a social and economic reality. The study of this form of land ownership and of the motivations and conditions of the concessions reveals a specific social dynamic. The attachment of vassal lords to their dependent fiefs reveals what was socially at stake in this type of tenure. Moreover, the various types of development and use of agricultural resources it allowed point to its economic importance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0150.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire & Sociétés RuralesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207