MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989726371 · doi:10.1289/isee.2016.3918

Exposure to low ambient concentrations of criteria air pollutants in Ontario, Canada, and the incidence of acute myocardial infraction and congestive heart failure, 1996-2012

2016· article· en· W2989726371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaDalhousie UniversityMcGill UniversityInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaCarleton UniversityPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeHeart failureMyocardial infarctionPopulationCohortIncidence (geometry)Hazard ratioProportional hazards modelCohort studyBody mass indexEnvironmental healthInternal medicineEmergency medicineCardiologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Exposure to ambient air pollution, even at relatively low concentrations, has been linked to increased cardiovascular deaths. Less is known about the impact of low-level air pollution on the incidence of major cardiovascular outcomes such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and congestive heart failure (CHF). We conducted a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, where the concentrations of pollutants are among the lowest in the world, to assess whether air pollution exposure is associated with incident AMI and CHF. Methods: We assembled a cohort of 50,464 adults from Ontario who responded to one of five population-based health surveys between 1996 and 2008 and had no prior history of cardiovascular disease. Follow-up extended until 31 December 2012. First-time incident AMI and CHF (nonfatal and fatal) were ascertained from the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database and the Ontario Congestive Heart Failure Databases, two validated databases in Ontario, as well as the vital statistics database. We derived 2-year running average concentrations of PM2.5, NO2, and O3 at the subjects’ residences before events from satellite observations, land-use regression models, and an optimal interpolation method, respectively. We used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for various individual and contextual risk factors from the surveys such as smoking, body mass index, and neighborhood income. The association was estimated for each pair of outcomes and air pollutants. We conducted various sensitivity analyses including further control for access to family physicians. Results: For each interquartile range increase of PM2.5 (3.5μg/m3), the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.14) for AMI and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.99-1.09) for CHF. No consistent evidence of association was observed for NO2 and O3. Our risk estimates were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Exposure to PM2.5, even at low levels, may contribute to the incidence of AMI and CHF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it