Relationship between striatal <sup>123</sup>I-FP-CIT uptake and cognitive functions in Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
パーキンソン病患者69名の認知機能と線条体ドパミントランスポーター（dopamine transporter; DAT）集積の関連を調べた．DATの集積形態別では，eagle wing群はegg shape群に比べ，運動症状が有意に軽度であった．認知機能は両群に有意差がなかった．DATの集積と認知機能は，specific binding ratio（SBR）と注意機能，前頭葉機能，日常記憶などが有意に相関した．重回帰分析では年齢とfrontal assessment batteryがSBRの有意かつ独立した交絡因子であった．DATの集積は，年齢の影響を受けるが，前頭葉機能と関連が強く，運動・認知機能の重症度を示す補助的な指標になり得る．
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".