MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989756387 · doi:10.1071/rdv32n2ab21

21 The contrasting role of histone methyltransferases during nuclear reprogramming: SUV39H knockdown improves bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer, while the absence of EHMT2 hampers it

2019· article· en· W2989756387 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael Vilar Sampaio, Dewison Ricardo Ambrizi, Ricardo Perecin Nociti, Jorge H. Pinzón, Juliano Rodrigues Sangalli, Tiago Henrique Camara De, Kazuki Takahashi, Jonathan C. Cruz, Lawrence C. Smith, Pablo J. Ross, Flávio Vieira Meirelles

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReprogrammingGene knockdownBiologySomatic cell nuclear transferSomatic cellHistone methyltransferaseBlastocystEpigeneticsCell biologyMethyltransferaseHistoneMolecular biologyMethylationEmbryoCellCell cultureGeneticsEmbryogenesisGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The persistence of somatic epigenetic memory is indicated as the main barrier for efficient nuclear reprogramming. The augmented levels of histone methylation on somatic nuclei have been shown as the major regulator of this aberrant remodelling. Although they occupy the same site, H3K9me2 and H3K9me3 are catalysed by different histone methyltransferases (HMTs), EHMT2 and SUV39H, respectively. However, the influence of these HMTs during nuclear reprogramming is unclear. Hence, the main goal of this project was to investigate the role of HMTs responsible for H3K9 methylation during nuclear reprogramming and its consequences on embryo development. For this, we employed a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown approach targeting EHMT2, SUV39H1, and SUV39H2 in bovine fetal fibroblasts. The RT-qPCR analyses showed ~80% reduction in total RNA after siRNA treatments for the target genes when compared with the control vector. We then quantified the H3K9me2 and H3K9me3 levels by immunostaining. The analysis displayed that H3K9me2 levels were diminished ~50% compared with control, whereas the reduction of H3K9me3 levels was only ~25%. Cells transfected with siRNA targeting EHMT2, SUV39H1, and SUV39H2 (All-siRNA) or control vector (control) were used as a nuclear donor on somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in five biological replicates. The IVF embryos were used as a biological control for immunostaining analysis. Embryos at both 8- to 16-cell and blastocysts stage (n = 10 from 5 replicates) were collected to evaluate the effect of HMT knockdown on H3K9me2 and H3K9me3 levels by immunostaining. We found a reduction of blastocyst rates in the treatment 28 ± 6.3 (mean ± s.e.m.) when compared with control 60 ± 4.8 (P = 0.004). The immunostaining analysis showed that the levels of H3K9me2 and H3K9me3 were higher in cloned (control) than IVF embryos (P < 0.05). Moreover, the All-siRNA group displayed a reduction in H3K9me2 levels compared with the control group and IVF through developmental stages analysed (P < 0.05). Differently, H3K9me3 levels were higher in the All-siRNA group at the 8- to 16-cell stage, but no difference was found between treated and control groups at the blastocyst stage. We, therefore, decided to test whether individual knockdown would display a different result. We then used cells transfected with siRNA targeting only EHMT2 (EHMT2-siRNA), targeting SUV39H1 + SUV39H2 (SUV-siRNA), or control vector (control) as a nuclear donor on SCNT in five biological replicates. Surprisingly, the SUV-siRNA group increased blastocyst production 38 ± 4.4 when compared with the control group 29 ± 4.4 (P = 0.01), whereas the EHMT2-siRNA showed a reduction in blastocyst rates: 21 ± 5.6 (P = 0.04). Our results indicate that EHMT2 has a key role during SCNT, possibly by its crosstalk with other modifications. Even though the SUV39H knockdown induced a small reduction in H3K9me3 levels in the nuclear donor, it was enough to increase the blastocyst rates by 10%. These results will allow us to better understand the complex mechanisms involved in the persistent epigenetic memory during nuclear reprogramming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207