Selection on a pleiotropic color gene block underpins early differentiation between two warbler species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract When one species gradually splits into two, divergent selection on specific traits can cause peaks of differentiation in the genomic regions encoding those traits. Whether speciation is initiated by strong selection on a few genomic regions with large effects or by more diffused selection on many regions with small effects remains controversial. Differentiated phenotypes between differentiating lineages are commonly involved in reproductive isolation, thus their genetic underpinnings are key to the genomics architecture of speciation. When two species hybridize, recombination over multiple generations can help reveal the genetic regions responsible for the differentiated phenotypes against a genomic background that has been homogenized via backcrossing and introgression. We used admixture mapping to investigate genomic differentiation and the genetic basis of differentiated plumage features (relative melanin and carotenoid pigment) between hybridizing sister species in the early stage of speciation: Townsend’s ( Setophaga townsendi ) and Hermit warblers ( S. occidentalis ). We found a few narrow and dispersed divergent regions between allopatric parental populations, consistent with the ‘divergence with gene flow’ model of speciation. One of the divergent peaks involves three genes known to affect pigmentation: ASIP, EIF2S2, and RALY (the ASIP-RALY gene block). After controlling for population substructure, we found that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) inside the intron of RALY displays a strong pleiotropic association with cheek, crown, and breast coloration. In addition, we detect selection on the ASIP-RALY gene block, as the geographic cline of the RALY marker of this gene block has remained narrower than the plumage cline, which remained narrower than expected under neutral diffusion over two decades. Despite extensive gene flow between these species across much of the genome, the selection on ASIP-RALY gene block maintains stable genotypic and plumage difference between species allowing further differentiation to accumulate via linkage to its flanking genetic region or linkage-disequilibrium genome-wide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".