MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989790544 · doi:10.1080/14753820.2018.1464260

Reviews of Books

2018· article· en· W2989790544 on OpenAlexaff
Marcella Trambaioli, David G. Pattison, Manuel Hijano, Fabio López Lázaro, William Childers, Katherine van Liere, John A. Jones, Don W. Cruickshank, C. A. Longhurst, Alexandra Wilhelmsen, Guillem Colom-Montero, Elena Cueto Asín, Lorraine Ryan, Abigail Lee Six, Sanjay Subrahmanyam, Filipa Ribeiro da Silva, Iona McCleery, Concepción Reverte Bernal, Humberto Núñez-Faraco, Eugenio Matibag, Alexander Dawson, John A. McCulloch

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Spanish Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al ser el libro un homenaje a Ann L. Mackenzie, ‘Preface’ e ‘Introduction’ están dedicados a la ilustre estudiosa e histórica editora del prestigioso Bulletin, reconstruyendo su trayectoria científ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6050.491

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Spanish StudiesSame topicHuman auditory perception and evaluationFrench-language works237,207