MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989794282 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2019.2956514

Mobility-Aware Computation Offloading in MEC-Based Vehicular Wireless Networks

2019· article· en· W2989794282 on OpenAlexaff
Vu Huy Hoang, Tai Manh Ho, Long Bao Le

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile edge computingComputation offloadingServerComputer networkHandoverWirelessComputationEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionWireless networkTask (project management)Edge computingReal-time computingAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the mobility-aware computation offloading design for mobile edge computing (MEC) based vehicular wireless networks which considers random mobility of the vehicle and its potential handover during the offloading process. The computation offloading decision is made by comparing the average total costs due to the local and remote computation task executions at the vehicle and the MEC servers, respectively. Toward this end, we propose an analytical model to determine the average total cost due to remote task execution. We evaluate the performance of the proposed design by comparing its achievable cost with that due to an average mobility-based approximation. Simulation results show a cost reduction of up to 17% compared to the baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207