MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989830387 · doi:10.1115/omae2019-96338

How Does a Stationary Sand Bed Affect the Flow Dynamics in an Eccentric Annulus?

2019· article· en· W2989830387 on OpenAlexaff
Majid Bizhani, Ergün Kuru

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnulus (botany)Geotechnical engineeringTurbulenceParticle image velocimetryGeologyMechanicsShear stressDrilling fluidDrill stringFlow (mathematics)DrillingMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the drilling operations, it is common to have a stationary bed of the drilled cuttings in the high angle sections of the wellbore. The bed must be removed in the later stages before running the casing, or when it starts to cause high torque and drag on the drill string. The mere act of circulating drilling fluid, however, may not clean the well (i.e., critical flow rate and shear stress for bed erosion must be reached). In an effort to better understand the underlying mechanisms of bed removal process during hole cleaning, in this paper, we look at how the presence of a stationary sand bed affects the flow field in an eccentric annulus. Experiments simulating turbulent flow of water in an eccentric annulus with/without the presence of stationary sand bed have been conducted by using a 9m long horizontal flow loop (with an annular configuration of 95 mm ID outer pipe and 38 mm OD inner pipe). The flow loop was equipped with particle image velocimetry (PIV) system, which was used to collect velocity field data. The PIV data were then used to study the characteristics of the turbulent flow of water in the eccentric annulus. The velocity field and Reynolds stress profiles were analyzed in two planes, one perpendicular to the bed interface and off-center of the annulus, and the other along the center-line of the annulus. Experiments were carried out with the presence of two different height stationary sand beds and also without a sand bed as the control case. The extent to which the presence of the sand bed affects the flow appears to be a strong function of the bed height in the annulus. For a small bed height, deviation of the velocity field from the no bed case was slight. In this case, Reynolds normal and shear stress values were lower near the bed interface comparing to the annulus centerline. On the other hand, for a flow over a thicker bed, this behavior changed, and the flow became more uniform in the annulus (in terms of turbulence and mean flow properties). The results help in understanding the mechanism of bed erosion under constant pump flow rate. From the practical point of view, data presented here suggest that hole cleaning in an eccentric annulus progressively becomes more difficult as the bed becomes smaller. The results also explain why in long horizontal and extended reach wells often wiper trips are required for proper cleaning of the hole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207