MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989853760 · doi:10.1115/detc2019-97382

Modeling, Simulation and Assessment of a Hybrid Electric Ferry: Case Study for Mid-Size Ferry

2019· article· en· W2989853760 on OpenAlexaff
Yanbiao Feng, Li Chen, Zuomin Dong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowertrainAutomotive engineeringElectrificationPropulsionDiesel fuelWork (physics)Electrically powered spacecraft propulsionEngineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringElectricityElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringTorqueAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The hybrid electric propulsion system presents a feasible and attractive fuel cost and emission reduction solution for heavy-duty transportation applications, particularly for large marine vessels. The model of a specially designed hybrid electric powertrain system has been introduced. The work uses the acquired operation and power load patterns of the BC Ferries Skeena Queen as a case study to demonstrate the fuel cost and emission reduction potentials of the electrified technology by comparing results from three powertrain alternatives: traditional diesel engine, diesel-electric, and series hybrid electric. The results showed that the electrification and hybridization could significantly reduce both fuel cost and harmful emissions. The series hybrid electric powertrain system has been targeted in this work due to its relatively small powertrain architecture difference from the traditional diesel-electric powertrain, and the ease of control development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207