Doprinos smanjenju rizika sudara između brodova simuliranjem radnji izbjegavanja sudara
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this graduate thesis, the term of Close Quarter Situation, is analyzed. This term is mentioned in the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea and although mentioned the definition of the term is not clear. In this thesis there are several definitions of Close Quarter Situation given by different authors, these authors and experts based their definitions on their experience in the court law. The difference between the definitions of the mentioned term has been an inspiration for the research carried on the navigational simulator. For the research on the simulator the ships were divided into two main groups: fine form ships and full form ships. Using mentioned groups of different scenarios were defined and than simulated on the navigational simulator. A total of 60 simulations were carried out, with the goal to getting the values of the dCPA (distance to closest point of approach) and TCPA (time to closest point of approach), the values at which ship still can avoid collision with it's own action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".