Discerning the effects of phosphate status on the metabolism of hybrid poplar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accumulation of phosphate in leaves as external environmental phosphate concentrations increase has been observed across the plant kingdom. The excess storage of anions, such as phosphate, has various metabolic trade-offs, including a corresponding influx of counter-ions to maintain charge balance and/or the reduction in organic acid content to maintain internal pH. The leaves and roots of four hybrid poplar genotypes were tested for differences in metabolic response to increasing external phosphate and further effects on patterns of anion resorption among hybrid poplar and willow were explored. Organic acid concentrations increased or remained constant across treatments, suggesting that metabolic adjustments were made in response to greater influxes of inorganic cations rather than a response to increasing phosphate. During senescence, the hybrid poplar Tristis had higher sulfate and organic acid resorption, while hybrid willow, AAFC-5, had higher phosphate resorption proficiencies, suggesting differing anion remobilization mechanisms. Furthermore, phosphate accumulation was shown to continue well after bud-set in poplar hybrids, which may contribute to the low phosphorus resorption efficiency. This indicates that closely related species, with similar growth strategies, show preferential resorption toward different nutrients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".