Reduced Order Model for Unsteady Fluid Flows via Recurrent Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we present a data-driven approach to construct a reduced-order model (ROM) for the unsteady flow field and fluid-structure interaction. This proposed approach relies on (i) a projection of the high-dimensional data from the Navier-Stokes equations to a low-dimensional subspace using the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and (ii) integration of the low-dimensional model with the recurrent neural networks. For the hybrid ROM formulation, we consider long short term memory networks with encoder-decoder architecture, which is a special variant of recurrent neural networks. The mathematical structure of recurrent neural networks embodies a non-linear state space form of the underlying dynamical behavior. This particular attribute of an RNN makes it suitable for non-linear unsteady flow problems. In the proposed hybrid RNN method, the spatial and temporal features of the unsteady flow system are captured separately. Time-invariant modes obtained by low-order projection embodies the spatial features of the flow field, while the temporal behavior of the corresponding modal coefficients is learned via recurrent neural networks. The effectiveness of the proposed method is first demonstrated on a canonical problem of flow past a cylinder at low Reynolds number. With regard to a practical marine/offshore engineering demonstration, we have applied and examined the reliability of the proposed data-driven framework for the predictions of vortex-induced vibrations of a flexible offshore riser at high Reynolds number.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it