MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989940032 · doi:10.4000/ries.8819

Autorité et sanctions en classe : le problème québécois

2019· article· fr· W2989940032 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denis Jeffrey

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale d éducation de Sèvres · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Discipline and Inequality
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nombre d’enseignants québécois hésitent à appliquer des sanctions aux élèves. D’une part, ils sont formés selon des approches pédagogiques qui misent sur la prévention et sur la bonne volonté des élèves, et d’autre part ils craignent d’abuser de leur pouvoir. Certains d’entre eux ont connu le châtiment corporel qui visait l’obéissance des élèves. L’auteur soutient que les enseignants doivent apprendre à faire valoir l’autorité des règles et des sanctions qui leur sont inhérentes. La sanction scolaire n’est certes pas la panacée à tous les problèmes disciplinaires, mais elle fait partie d’une logique d’intervention pour contrer les élèves indisciplinés et parfois agressifs à leur égard et à l’égard des autres élèves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale d éducation de SèvresSame topicEducation Discipline and InequalityFrench-language works237,207