Temporaliser la photographie : Marker, Varda, Wenders–Salgado
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À travers trois films qui reposent sur des photographies — Si j’avais quatre dromadaires de Chris Marker (1966), Ulysse d’Agnès Varda (1982) et Le sel de la Terre de Wim Wenders et Juliano Ribeiro Salgado (2014) —, cette contribution interroge la valeur et le sens de la restitution du temps. Nous considérons la part que joue dans le film la restitution du contexte bio-historiographique de la photographie, mais aussi la capacité de l’oeuvre photocinématographique à rendre sensible le temps. De quel temps s’agit-il alors ? Celui du réel photographié ou celui inventé par l’oeuvre ? Peut-on restituer ce temps réel et singulier de l’instant photographié, et est-ce cette restitution qui donnera tout son sens à la photographie ? Quelle importance faut-il donner à la singularité du moment ? L’enjeu de la restitution du temps ne dépasse-t-il pas celui de la restitution de cette singularité ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".