MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989947491 · doi:10.1109/smc.2019.8913995

Morphological Landmark Detection on Lobsters Using Attention Networks

2019· article· en· W2989947491 on OpenAlexaff
Parmeet Singh, Mae Seto

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandmarkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMechanism (biology)Convolutional neural networkAdaptabilityFocus (optics)Convolution (computer science)Artificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)CascadeMachine learningComputer visionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is map landmarks on lobsters using convolution neural networks. An attention mechanism for improving the performance of the VGG network to that effect is used. Regular CNN architectures do not consciously extract detailed features from images. The attention mechanism learns to focus on regions around the lobster landmarks amongst the whole image. Existing approaches use a cascade of regression models for landmark prediction. Proposed, is a single iteration model augmenting an attention mechanism to produce similar results. The adaptability of the attention mechanism over any network, such as VGG16 or Resnet, avoids the need to learn the network from scratch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207