MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989976804

트랜스미디어 콘텐츠-플랫폼으로서의 인터랙티브 다큐멘터리

2018· article· ko· W2989976804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
차민철

Bibliographic record

Venue문학과영상 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteractivityContext (archaeology)Representation (politics)Movie theaterMultimediaComputer scienceSociologyVisual artsArtHistoryPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Interactive refers to a new mode of documentary that is created and accepted through active interactivity with various multimedia materials based on Internet-based real-time cloud server. Especially since the mid-2000s, the Interactive Documentary, which has been rapidly emerging from France and Canada, raises new perspectives and discussions on the modality of documentary representation and its creation and acceptance mechanism. In this paper, we analyze the new documentary paradigm called ‘post-documentary’ on the extension line of ‘post-cinema’ discourse. We will also examine the concept and type of Interactive Documentary which is evolving into a new form of documentary, under the context of media convergence, transmedia, post-cinema and post-documentary paradigm. The ‘Interactive Documentary’ requires a renewal of fundamental and essential discussions on cinematic ontology beyond simple technological dimension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue문학과영상Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207