MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990060342 · doi:10.18280/i2m.180503

Real-Time False Data Detection in Smart Grid Based on Fuzzy Time Series

2019· article· en· W2990060342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid and Power Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime seriesComputer scienceData miningSeries (stratigraphy)Fuzzy logicGridReal-time computingPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

False measurements pose a major challenge to the stable operation of the smart grid. This paper aims to develop a real-time detection method for false measurements in the smart grid, especially when the error is in the function of Jacobean matrix. Considering its high robustness and excellent short-term prediction effect, the fuzzy time series was selected as the basis for our model. The detection is realized in three steps: fuzzification, fuzzy relationship determination and defuzzification. The established model was tested on a 30-node network using the PSSE. The results show that our model can accurately detect the false measurement that are inputted in the Jacobian matrix, which are not detectable by conventional systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it