Comprehensive Analysis and Optimization of Dynamic Vibration-Absorbing Structures for Electric Vehicles Driven by In-Wheel Motors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Distributed-drive electric vehicles (EVs) replace internal combustion engine with multiple motors, and the novel configuration results in new dynamic-related issues. This paper studies the coupling effects between the parameters and responses of dynamic vibration-absorbing structures (DVAS) for EVs driven by in-wheel motors (IWM). Firstly, a DVAS-based quarter suspension model is developed for distributed-drive EVs, from which nine parameters and five responses are selected for the coupling effect analysis. A two-stage global sensitivity analysis is then utilized to investigate the effect of each parameter on the responses. The control of the system is then converted into a multiobjective optimization problem with the defined system parameters being the optimization variables, and three dynamic limitations regarding both motor and suspension subsystems are taken as the constraints. A particle swarm optimization approach is then used to either improve ride comfort or mitigate IWM vibration, and two optimized parameter sets for these two objects are provided at last. Simulation results provide in-depth conclusions for the coupling effects between parameters and responses, as well as a guideline on how to design system parameters for contradictory objectives. It can be concluded that either passenger comfort or motor lifespan can be reduced up to 36% and 15% by properly changing the IWM suspension system parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it