MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990108870 · doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.34

New candidate radio supernova remnants detected in the GLEAM survey over 345° &lt;<i>l</i>&lt; 60°, 180° &lt;<i>l</i>&lt; 240°

2019· article· en· W2990108870 on OpenAlexaff
N. Hurley‐Walker, M. D. Filipović, B. M. Gaensler, D. A. Leahy, P. J. Hancock, T. M. O. Franzen, A. R. Offringa, J. R. Callingham, L. Hindson, Chengqing Wu, M. E. Bell, Bi‐Qing For, M. Johnston‐Hollitt, A. D. Kapińska, John Morgan, Tara Murphy, B. McKinley, P. Procopio, L. Staveley‐Smith, R. B. Wayth, Q. Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
FundersCurtin University of TechnologyAustralian GovernmentCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAstronomy Australia Limited
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsLongitudeSupernovaPulsarPopulationSkySupernova remnantAstronomyRadio telescopeTelescopeSurface brightnessBrightnessGalaxyMedicineLatitude

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have detected 27 new supernova remnants (SNRs) using a new data release of the GLEAM survey from the Murchison Widefield Array telescope, including the lowest surface brightness SNR ever detected, G 0.1 – 9.7. Our method uses spectral fitting to the radio continuum to derive spectral indices for 26/27 candidates, and our low-frequency observations probe a steeper spectrum population than previously discovered. None of the candidates have coincident WISE mid-IR emission, further showing that the emission is non-thermal. Using pulsar associations we derive physical properties for six candidate SNRs, finding G 0.1 – 9.7 may be younger than 10 kyr. Sixty per cent of the candidates subtend areas larger than 0.2 deg 2 on the sky, compared to &lt; 25% of previously detected SNRs. We also make the first detection of two SNRs in the Galactic longitude range 220°–240°.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of AustraliaSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207