Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Cold-Stored Platelets in Healthy Human Subjects Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Platelets are currently stored at 22°C (room temperature-stored) for clinical purposes. This approach has numerous downsides including limited storage time due to risk of bacterial growth, and increased costs caused by bacterial testing or pathogen reduction. Platelets stored at 4ºC (cold-stored) were the standard of care in the 1960s and 70s, and while they generally perform better than room temperature-stored platelets in in vitro assays, functional studies in vivo have yielded contradictory results. Methods: Eight healthy human participants were included in the analysis of this randomized, cross-over study. A double unit of apheresis platelets was collected from each subject for autologous transfusion. Platelets were stored for 5 days at either 4ºC, or 22ºC, based on randomization. On day 5, platelets were transfused 12-24 hours after participants received a loading dose of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel. An array of platelet function testing was done at baseline, after loading dose, and after transfusion (1h, 4h, 24h). The first round was followed by a wash-out period of at least 10 days, and a second sequence of collection, antiplatelet loading dose, and transfusion with platelets stored under alternate conditions from the first sequence. The primary endpoint was defined as post-transfusion platelet αIIbβ3 integrin activation in response to agonists for pathways inhibited by dual antiplatelet therapy, measured by the VerifyNOW assay. Secondary endpoints included platelet function testing by bleeding time, VASP-phosphorylation, light transmission aggregometry, and flow cytometric analysis of platelet αIIbβ3 integrin activation and α-granule secretion. Results: All cold-stored platelet units passed quality control analyses, and no platelet aggregates were observed at the end of the storage period. One room temperature-stored unit had to be discarded due to quality control failure. Transfusion of a double unit with 5 day cold-stored platelets was tolerated well by all recipients. The absolute number of transfused platelets did not differ significantly between the cold-storage arm and the room temperature storage arm. The corrected count increment did not differ significantly at 1h after transfusion, but was significantly lower in the cold-stored group at the 4h, and 24h time points. The primary endpoint, platelet function testing by VerifyNOW, showed reversal of the effect of acetylsalicylic acid with both products at 1h and 4h post transfusion, but platelet inhibition re-appeared after 24h post transfusion in the cold-storage arm, presumably due to accelerated clearance of cold-stored platelets. No significant differences were observed between the two products in the VerifyNOW assay for clopidogrel. The bleeding time (a secondary endpoint) did not differ significantly at any time point between the cold-stored and room temperature-stored transfusion group. However, the bleeding time improved or remained unchanged in all recipients transfused with room temperature-stored platelets, whereas, transfusion of cold-stored platelets caused prolongation of the bleeding time in 50% of recipients. Surprisingly, platelets isolated from recipients of room temperature-stored platelets aggregated significantly better in response to collagen compared to platelets isolated from recipients of cold-stored platelets at 1h and 4h post transfusion. Other secondary endpoints, including VASP-phosphorylation, αIIbβ3 integrin activation and α-granule secretion by flow cytometry, and platelet aggregation in response to arachidonic acid and ADP did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: We report the first safety and efficacy data of 5 day cold stored platelets in plasma. Unexpectedly, some endpoints demonstrate agonist- and assay-dependent inferiority of cold-stored platelets at early and late time points. Further studies are needed to determine the maximum storage time, and the efficacy of cold-stored platelets in actively bleeding patients and patients with platelet dysfunction. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".