MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Warm Forming Characteristics of AA7050-T6

2019· article· en· W2990184742 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Pishyar, Sante DiCecco, Michael J. Worswick

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormabilityMaterials scienceDigital image correlationIsothermal processMetallurgyAlloyStrain (injury)Forming processesComposite materialLimitingAluminiumMechanical engineeringMedicineThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formability of AA7050 aluminum alloy sheet is characterized under isothermal forming conditions at room temperature and 150 °C. The material was tested in the T6 condition. Nakazima limiting dome height (LDH) tests in conjunction with stereoscopic digital image correlation (DIC) strain measurements are used for the formability assessment. Four-point forming limit curves (FLCs) were developed at the two test temperatures. AA7050-T6 is shown to respond positively to elevated temperature forming with a 0.19 major true limit strain for a 76.2 mm Nakazima specimen, for example, compared to 0.13 at room temperature. The current results for AA7050-T6 are compared to the formability of AA7075-T6 sheet tested under similar conditions; a slightly higher formability was observed for the AA7075-T6 alloy at the elevated temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207