Felicidad, educación y democracia en el pensamiento de Nel Noddings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En su libro Happiness and Education (2003) Noddings ofrece pistas para repensar los objetivos de la educación y el papel que la búsqueda de la felicidad debe desempeñar entre ellos. En su análisis de las políticas educativas actuales, basadas en estándares, éstas no sólo están lejos de cumplir con sus objetivos, sino que además están lejos de cumplir con los requisitos de una democracia. Noddings llega a la conclusión de que los currículos educativos deben fomentar la búsqueda de la felicidad si quieren asegurar el cumplimiento de esta doble tarea. Para ello se apoya en los trabajos de los pragmatistas James y Dewey cuyos planteamientos ofrecen la posibilidad de superar la crítica a la crisis en la que se encuentra la educación según los términos establecidos por Arendt, en la medida en que se apoyan en la poética del espacio de Bachelard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".