MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Felicidad, educación y democracia en el pensamiento de Nel Noddings

2019· article· es· W2990192899 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alicia García, Gonzalo Jover Olmeda

Bibliographic record

VenueEncounters in Theory and History of Education · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical and Liberation Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En su libro Happiness and Education (2003) Noddings ofrece pistas para repensar los objetivos de la educación y el papel que la búsqueda de la felicidad debe desempeñar entre ellos. En su análisis de las políticas educativas actuales, basadas en estándares, éstas no sólo están lejos de cumplir con sus objetivos, sino que además están lejos de cumplir con los requisitos de una democracia. Noddings llega a la conclusión de que los currículos educativos deben fomentar la búsqueda de la felicidad si quieren asegurar el cumplimiento de esta doble tarea. Para ello se apoya en los trabajos de los pragmatistas James y Dewey cuyos planteamientos ofrecen la posibilidad de superar la crítica a la crisis en la que se encuentra la educación según los términos establecidos por Arendt, en la medida en que se apoyan en la poética del espacio de Bachelard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncounters in Theory and History of EducationSame topicCritical and Liberation PedagogyFrench-language works237,207