MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990194459 · doi:10.1002/adom.201901606

Narrow Emission from Rb<sub>3</sub>Sb<sub>2</sub>I<sub>9</sub> Nanoparticles

2019· article· en· W2990194459 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Johnston, Filip Dinic, Petar Todorović́, Bin Chen, Laxmi Kishore Sagar, Makhsud I. Saidaminov, Sjoerd Hoogland, Oleksandr Voznyy, Edward H. Sargent

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceSamsungUniversity of TorontoGovernment of CanadaUT-BattelleOak Ridge National LaboratorySamsung Advanced Institute of TechnologyBattelleBanting Research FoundationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceFull width at half maximumPerovskite (structure)HalideQuantum yieldOptoelectronicsNanoparticleNanotechnologyOpticsChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryFluorescencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metal halide perovskites have gained attention for their optoelectronic properties and are employed as the active layer in solar cells, light‐emitting diodes, and photodetectors. However, the use of lead in the best‐performing perovskite devices may limit their wider application. Prior reports of lead‐free perovskite nanoparticles have exhibited linewidths more than twice as wide as their lead‐halide counterparts, limiting their attainable color gamut. Here the solution synthesis of lead‐free Rb3Sb2I9 nanoplatelets and single crystals is reported; the single crystals exhibit broad (full‐width at half‐maximum (FWHM) = 75 nm) photoluminescence centered at 635 nm, while the nanoplatelets exhibit narrow emission (FWHM = 21 nm) at 512 nm. The photoluminescence quantum yield of both the single crystals and nanoplatelets is low and the present demonstration of the narrowest emission among all lead‐free perovskites reported to date motivates further study of how these and related materials can achieve further‐enhanced brightness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207