MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990224189 · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2955963

Guest Editorial Special Section on AI-Driven Developments in 5G-Envisioned Industrial Automation: Big Data Perspective

2019· editorial· en· W2990224189 on OpenAlexaff
Sahil Garg, Mohsen Guizani, Song Guo, Christos Verikoukis

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomationBig dataPaceIndustrial RevolutionIndustrial InternetIndustry 4.0Special sectionThe InternetPerspective (graphical)Field (mathematics)Computer scienceISA100.11aEngineeringInternet of ThingsTelecommunicationsManufacturing engineeringProcess automation systemArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The papers in this special section examine artificial intelligence (AI)-driven developments in 5G mobile communications for industrial automation applications from a Big Data perspective. With the recent advances in information and communication technologies, industrial automation is expanding at a rapid pace. This transition is characterized by “Industry 4.0”, the fourth revolution in the field of manufacturing. Industry 4.0, also called as “Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)” or “Smart Factories”, is a reflection of new industrial revolution that is not only interconnected, but also communicate, analyze, and use the information to create a more holistic and better connected ecosystem for the industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0120.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207