MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990239312

Genomic Prediction for Reproductive Traits of Commercial Sows in Health Challenged Herds

2019· article· en· W2990239312 on OpenAlexaff
Jack C. M. Dekkers, Nick V. L. Serão, John C. S. Harding, Graham Plastow, Cassie Scanlan, Benny E Mote, Philip Willson

Bibliographic record

VenueIowa State University animal industry report · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParity (physics)TraitGenomic selectionBiologyHerdRangingGeneticsAnimal scienceGeneComputer scienceSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study performed genomic prediction for reproductive performance of sows in commercial farms with a history of health problems. Accuracies of genomic predictions for lifetime performance were low to moderate, ranging from 0.11 (TNB) to 0.45 (NBD). Accuracies of genomic prediction for later parity performance using parity 1 performance were low, ranging from -0.07 (NSB in parity 3) to 0.19 (NBD in parity 2), with average accuracies by trait ranging from 0.04 (NSB) to 0.16 (NBD). Although most accuracies were low, the moderately high accuracies for some lifetime performance traits shows that genomic prediction can be used to improve reproductive performance in commercial sows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIowa State University animal industry reportSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207