Entre protection et mobilisation : contributions canadiennes et québécoises à l’histoire transnationale des droits des enfants handicapés (1920-1980)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article repère les principaux jalons de la mobilisation à l’égard des enfants handicapés au Québec et dans le monde. Il s’intéresse en particulier à l’émergence d’un mouvement de défense des droits des enfants infirmes sur la scène internationale pendant l’entre-deux-guerres, auquel le Canada, incluant le Québec, ont participé. En s’appuyant sur un corpus de sources variées, l’étude démontre qu’une conception sociale de l’enfance infirme a principalement été véhiculée par les acteurs de ce mouvement, sans être pour autant exempte de l’influence médicale. En insistant sur les causes socio-économiques responsables de l’infirmité, les philanthropes discréditent un autre discours qui fait porter le poids des déficiences sur des facteurs individuels. Notre lecture de ce mouvement d’avant-garde nuance l’interprétation selon laquelle une emprise médicale hégémonique aurait pesé sur les jeunes handicapés jusqu’à l’intensification de l’activisme dans les années 1960.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".