O Software GeoGebra no Ensino da Matemática: Relatos a partir de Teses e Dissertações
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo tem por objetivo mapear e investigar quais discussões tem sido privilegiadas nas investigações envolvendo o software GeoGebra que tem se destacado no cenário da Educação Matemática. Analisamos teses de doutorado e dissertações de mestrados (acadêmico e profissional) disponíveis no Catálogo online de Teses e Dissertações da CAPES no período de 2017 e 2018. Para seleção dos trabalhos analisados foi utilizada a palavra "GeoGebra" como palavra-chave, refinando a busca para área de concentração em Educação Matemática. Trata-se de uma análise interpretativa que buscou identificar nos títulos e resumos dos trabalhos os níveis de ensino, os sujeitos das pesquisas, os conteúdos matemáticos abordados e a modalidade de investigação.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".