Cardinal Bessarion, mystical theology and spiritual union between East and West
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardinal Bessarion is best known as the apostle of union between the two historic Churches and the advocate of cultural reintegration of East and West. Much historical investigation has been concerned with his motives when, as a representative of the Eastern Church, he accepted the short-lived Church Union achieved at the Council of Florence in 1438/9 and subsequently immersed himself in western culture. In the latter case, considerably more attention has been given to his humanist endeavours and philosophical interests than to his theological views. The present study examines Bessarion's writings in correlation with the challenges faced and the steps taken from his early life in the East through his subsequent western career, which led him to find in his own Byzantine heritage a solution to the religious differences between East and West. In his synthesis of mystical theology and Neoplatonic philosophy, Bessarion offered an apophatic understanding of God which rose above dogmatic disputation to provide what he considered to be a means for achieving a true and lasting spiritual union.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".