The effect of pregnancy on nitrogen retention, maternal insulin sensitivity, and mRNA abundance of genes involved in energy and amino acid metabolism in gilts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twenty-one of each pregnant (P) and nonserviced, nonpregnant (NP) sister-pairs of gilts were selected to investigate the effect of pregnancy on protein deposition (Pd; whole body and maternal), insulin sensitivity, and mRNA abundance of genes involved in energy and AA metabolism. Between breeding (study day 0) and day 111, P and NP gilts received 2.16 kg of the experimental diet (3.34 Mcal ME/kg, 17.6% crude protein, 0.78% standardized ileal digestible lysine) that was formulated to meet the estimated ME requirements of pregnant gilts (and meet or exceed AA requirements). Nitrogen balances were conducted on day 63 and 102 ± 0.2 of the study during 4-d periods. Blood samples were collected on day 43, 56, 71, 85, 98, and 108 ± 0.3 of the study to determine plasma concentrations of fasted IGF-1, estradiol (E2), and estrone sulfate (E1S). Frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests (FSIGTT) were conducted on day 75 ± 0.7 in 6 P and 5 NP gilts and on day 107 ± 0.4 in 17 P and 17 NP gilts and the MINMOD approach was applied to evaluate whole body insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsiveness. Longissimus muscle (LM) and s.c. adipose tissue (AD) samples were excised from 12 P and 12 NP gilts at day 111 ± 0.4 of the study after euthanasia to determine mRNA abundance of key genes. Whole body Pd was greater (P < 0.001) at day 102 and maternal Pd was lower (P < 0.002) at day 63 and 102 for P compared to NP gilts. Plasma concentrations of E1S and E2 increased (P < 0.05) with study day for P gilts and remained constant for NP gilts, which coincided with reduced plasma concentrations of IGF-1 and increased estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) mRNA abundance in LM of P gilts. Glucose effectiveness was not different between P and NP gilts, but whole body insulin sensitivity was lower (P = 0.004) in P compared to NP gilts on day 75 and 107, which corresponded with reduced mRNA abundances of SLC2A4, HK2, SREBF1, and FASN, and increased abundances of PDK4 and PPARGC1A in LM and AD. When fed identically, P gilts had greater whole body Pd at day 102, which reflects Pd in the pregnancy-associated tissues (at the expense of maternal Pd), likely driven by estrogen-stimulated insulin resistance in peripheral tissue and subsequent modulation of gene expression relating to glucose metabolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".