MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2990414305 · doi:10.1289/isee.2016.3251

Did a vehicle emission inspection program lead to lower cardiovascular mortality in the Greater Vancouver region?

2016· article· en· W2990414305 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jiayun Yao, Sarah B. Henderson, Michael Bräuer

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyMedicineDistributed lagMortality ratePopulationTrap (plumbing)Secular variationEnvironmental healthGeographyStatisticsSurgeryMeteorologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The AirCare vehicle inspection program began in 1992 to control tailpipe emissions within the Greater Vancouver area, Canada, and ended in 2014. Since 1992, there have been regional declines in concentrations of traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) and cardiovascular mortality. Some of the declines in TRAP can be attributed to the AirCare program. While higher level of TRAP has been associated with higher rate of cardiovascular mortality, it is possible that some of the declines in cardiovascular mortality in the region is the effect of the AirCare program. This study is aimed to quantify such an effect, which is challenging to separate from the secular trend of mortality resulting from other complex factors. Methods: A time-slice analysis was applied to estimate the effect of each AirCare phase compared with the previous phase, both unadjusted and with adjustment for cardiovascular mortality secular trends observed in Victoria and Calgary, two most comparable cities in Canada without similar programs. A time-series analysis was applied to estimate the effect of every 100 failed cars on cardiovascular mortality in a distributed lag framework. Results: Time-slice analyses showed that the AirCare effects were sensitive to choice of the control population. Time-series analyses showed a 2.9% (95%CI 1.0%, 4.9%) decrease in daily cardiovascular mortality for each 100 cars that failed, when the lagged effect was distributed over one year. Results suggest that the AirCare program reduced cardiovascular mortality in the region by 2,000-11,000 deaths over its lifetime. Conclusions: Evaluation of an air quality intervention implemented over 22 years is statistically challenging. Our results suggest that the AirCare program contributes to the reduction of cardiovascular mortality in the Greater Vancouver area, and provide evidence for other regions considering implementation or extension of similar programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference Abstracts→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→