Créolisation, imaginaire racial et marché musical franco-louisianais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En partant du terrain louisianais et de la gestion de la différence dans la construction du répertoire franco-louisianais, cet article explore les usages locaux et les représentations de la notion de créolisation, et questionne son utilisation comme catégorie d’analyse. Les styles dits cadien, créole et zydeco, sont associés dans le Sud-Ouest louisianais à des catégories d’identifications distinctes, les Cadiens et les Créoles. La valorisation de leurs influences réciproques se nourrit d’une logique de différenciation qui fait consensus chez l’ensemble des acteurs sociaux. Les pratiques musicales témoignent d’une oscillation permanente entre, d’une part, la métaphore du mélange, de l’adaptation et de la créativité et, d’autre part, la rhétorique des origines et la naturalisation de la différence. De leur côté, les chercheurs qui travaillent sur la région s’emparent de la notion de créolisation en la cantonnant à un usage lisse, décrivant un processus culturel bénéfique et valorisant, dépouillé de tout clivage et circonscrit à un héritage francophone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".