MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Créolisation, imaginaire racial et marché musical franco-louisianais

2012· book-chapter· fr· W2990431712 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCNRS Éditions eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En partant du terrain louisianais et de la gestion de la différence dans la construction du répertoire franco-louisianais, cet article explore les usages locaux et les représentations de la notion de créolisation, et questionne son utilisation comme catégorie d’analyse. Les styles dits cadien, créole et zydeco, sont associés dans le Sud-Ouest louisianais à des catégories d’identifications distinctes, les Cadiens et les Créoles. La valorisation de leurs influences réciproques se nourrit d’une logique de différenciation qui fait consensus chez l’ensemble des acteurs sociaux. Les pratiques musicales témoignent d’une oscillation permanente entre, d’une part, la métaphore du mélange, de l’adaptation et de la créativité et, d’autre part, la rhétorique des origines et la naturalisation de la différence. De leur côté, les chercheurs qui travaillent sur la région s’emparent de la notion de créolisation en la cantonnant à un usage lisse, décrivant un processus culturel bénéfique et valorisant, dépouillé de tout clivage et circonscrit à un héritage francophone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it