The lateral and medial approach in total arthroplasty for valgus knee: a meta-analysis of current literature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: To compare the lateral and medial approaches of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the valgus knee. Materials & methods: An electronic search from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library was performed according to ‘TKA’, ‘valgus’, ‘knee’ and ‘approach’. Subsequently, manual search was conducted from the reference lists in the identified studies. Results: Four randomized controlled trials and five cohorts were included. Better knee society score and function was noticed in patients after lateral approach. Similar postoperative valgus deformity, operative time, blood loss, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, range of motion, pain and total complications in both groups. Conclusion: Compared with the medial approach for TKA in valgus knee, current data shows superior results after TKA by the lateral approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it